The difference between traditional divorce litigation and collaborative divorce

A couple facing divorce often fight in a battle of conflicting emotions. Disputes usually surface because of disagreements on child custody, support, property distribution and other arrangements. Separating couples could resolve these disputes extra-judicially, but when you fail to reach an agreement, you could end up fighting in court.

Resolving issues in court through litigation

The traditional route of divorce is through litigation. When you and your spouse disagree on the terms of your divorce, you can bring it up during the legal proceedings. You must attend hearings and present evidence to support your case. The court could resolve your disagreements on custody, support or property distribution based on the facts you present.

Divorce through court litigation often takes time and effort. You might need to attend several hearings if you and your spouse continue to disagree. As the court decides on the issue, you cannot be sure the decision will favor you.

Collaborative divorce offers a more peaceful separation

Instead of fighting and winning your case in court, collaborative divorce allows you and your spouse to work together. Together with your respective lawyers, you can develop an arrangement that works for both of you. It offers a better way of resolving divorce and family matters peacefully and without the stress of going through court. Collaborative divorce assures that the results will not harm any of the parties.

Divorce is a complex legal and emotional process. As different people have different situations, it is worth assessing which divorce approach would be appropriate for you. In any case, seeking guidance from an experienced family law attorney is an excellent first step toward your new chapter in life.